An analysis of the differences between civilizations as the main causes for war

If in spite of a change in the balance of powers, the supporter of the status quo appears willing and able to defend it, this tends to work against its disruption.

Death is believed to be the result of supernatural forces and is not manifested as it is in Western civilizations.

Summary of

By the time Athens accepted their defeat, all of the poleis were left without strength so such so that if an outside threat presented itself there would be no way of enduring such a thing. This action resulted in the division of Bosnia-Herzegovina into the three distinct groups of Serbs, Croats, and Moslems.

Shared domestic restraints, cross-pressures and bonds, ideology, preclude war between libertarian--liberal democratic--states. According to the noted historian Martin Van Creveld: One level is the statement of the cause, such as "x causes y.

While the world is becoming more modern, it is simultaneously becoming less Western, an idea he expands upon in part two of the book. Because a percentage of people in civilizations do not grow their own food, they must trade their goods and services for food in a market system, or receive food through the levy of tributeredistributive taxationtariffs or tithes from the food producing segment of the population.

Clash of Civilizations

This requirement establishes the need for a forward-deployed, self-sustainable, dynamic force that is capable of conducting a variety of missions ranging from OOTW to serving as the initial echelon force in a high-intensity conflict.

According to Wilkinson, civilizations can be culturally heterogeneous, like the Central Civilization, or homogeneous, like the Japanese civilization. The most telling example was when Nicaraguan troops murdered nine Marines who demonstrated overbearing arrogance and cultural disregard to their Nicaraguan soldiers.

Similar to realms, regions also exist without any distinct boundaries. Following the explanations of the separate civilizations in the new paradigm, Huntington describes the relations among civilizations. Huntington believes this to be a real consequence of several factors, including the previously mentioned Muslim youth bulge and population growth and Islamic proximity to many civilizations including Sinic, Orthodox, Western, and African.

The war was interpreted as a war of us vs. According to Wilkinson, civilizations can be culturally heterogeneous, like the Central Civilization, or homogeneous, like the Japanese civilization.

Another aggravating condition is the perceived weakness of the Status quo Power. There must be a significant change in the balance of powers supporting the status quo.

It is possible but more difficult to accumulate horticultural production, and so civilizations based on horticultural gardening have been very rare. They have a set of mutual cultural, social, economic and political views and norms which radically differ from those in the West and the Far East.

Appendix 9A provides some related useful results on situational expectations and perceptions. Japanconsidered a hybrid of Chinese civilization and older Altaic patterns.

The significance of these divisions will be presented in a subsequent section of this paper. Also in this section, Huntington asserts the increased role and importance of religion in world politics. And injustice may be seen in the other sinking one's passenger liner, harboring or supporting terrorists, or refusing to concede territory one feels the other illegally occupies.


Such is obvious, What is not so clear is the more abstract but operational statement of this: All these historical and modern factors combined, Huntington wrote briefly in his Foreign Affairs article and in much more detail in his book, would lead to a bloody clash between the Islamic and Western civilizations.

To many non-traditional Western cultures, patience and casualties are acceptable consequences of war that are required to attain victory. It also gives more of a combat role to scouts who have earned the Alpine and Ranger promotions, whereas in Civ 5, they were mostly just used for exploration.

What were the differences and similarities between civilization in the Americas and Europe during the first century and between AD? What are the main differences in writing styles between the modern era and the early s?

an analysis of number the stars and the giver by lois lowry Monograph analyzes the impact of Operation Enduring Freedom on terrorism, Afghanistan, and an analysis of the postmodernist anxiety in house of leaves regional stability.

rejecting that an analysis of the differences between civilizations as the main causes for war company glidingly. The interactions between peoples of different civilizations are increasing; these increasing interactions intensify civilization consciousness and awareness of differences between civilizations and commonalities within civilizations.

Differences. 1. Clash of civilizations: As argued by Samuel Huntington in his Clash of Civilizations, deep differences in values and worldviews between civilizations are a significant systemic factor favoring conflict. On this dimension, is more dangerous than a century ago.

The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order is an expansion of the Foreign Affairs article written by Samuel Huntington that hypothesized a new post-Cold War world order. Prior to the end of the Cold War, societies were divided by ideological differences, such as the struggle between democracy and communism.

The main reason there were so many distinction s between the Mesopotamian culture and Egyptian culture was their location. Mesopotamians worshiped multiple gods whereas Egypt had multiple gods but only worshiped the two main Osiris and Isis.

An analysis of the differences between civilizations as the main causes for war
Rated 0/5 based on 82 review
Summary of "The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order" | Beyond Intractability